<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BingeReviews - My binge on political domain names before the 2008 election</title>
	<link>http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/bingereviews-my-binge-on-political-domain-names-before-the-2008-election/</link>
	<description>A beginner's guide to the domain industry</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Joe XiX Pack</title>
		<link>http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/bingereviews-my-binge-on-political-domain-names-before-the-2008-election/#comment-2174</link>
		<author>Joe XiX Pack</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/bingereviews-my-binge-on-political-domain-names-before-the-2008-election/#comment-2174</guid>
		<description>hahaha..u guYs dunno whaT uR talkin about, REALLY!

As a reminder, in Real Estate...it's a buY and hoLd thingiE, then w8 and seE!

I do suggest that U guys wait for the domain reBoom and you'd be surEpriZed coz .US rules since America rules and still will, the world.

The real wild cards are .biz
WannaBet or WannaBe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahaha..u guYs dunno whaT uR talkin about, REALLY!</p>
<p>As a reminder, in Real Estate&#8230;it&#8217;s a buY and hoLd thingiE, then w8 and seE!</p>
<p>I do suggest that U guys wait for the domain reBoom and you&#8217;d be surEpriZed coz .US rules since America rules and still will, the world.</p>
<p>The real wild cards are .biz<br />
WannaBet or WannaBe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/bingereviews-my-binge-on-political-domain-names-before-the-2008-election/#comment-2018</link>
		<author>Matthew</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/bingereviews-my-binge-on-political-domain-names-before-the-2008-election/#comment-2018</guid>
		<description>what about RallyTheVote.com ? i have that domain and waiting for a political or on of the social organizations to call and spend big time on this!

or I wish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about RallyTheVote.com ? i have that domain and waiting for a political or on of the social organizations to call and spend big time on this!</p>
<p>or I wish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Parson</title>
		<link>http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/bingereviews-my-binge-on-political-domain-names-before-the-2008-election/#comment-355</link>
		<author>Bob Parson</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 23:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/bingereviews-my-binge-on-political-domain-names-before-the-2008-election/#comment-355</guid>
		<description>Ok lets think about it JoeAmerica.org that is better than JoeAmerica.com or how about my HillaryClintons.info that is good. I like the way you use the s on the end most people forget that can work..I had JamesBrowns.com and gave it up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok lets think about it JoeAmerica.org that is better than JoeAmerica.com or how about my HillaryClintons.info that is good. I like the way you use the s on the end most people forget that can work..I had JamesBrowns.com and gave it up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/bingereviews-my-binge-on-political-domain-names-before-the-2008-election/#comment-42</link>
		<author>Matt</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/bingereviews-my-binge-on-political-domain-names-before-the-2008-election/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Charlie --&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the comments.  I think we all favor .com's -- it's really the only top level that has serious traction to it.  I'm willing to speculate a bit on .us and .info domains, but a lot needs to happen before those (or any other non-.com's) takeoff to an appreciable degree.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sometimes I wonder whether - in the long term - some of the country code top levels will only hold value for &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Country_code_top-level_domain" rel="nofollow"&gt;unconventional uses&lt;/a&gt;, like &lt;a href="http://del.icio.us" rel="nofollow"&gt;del.icio.us&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Time will tell.  Thanks again for the comment.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie &#8211;</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments.  I think we all favor .com&#8217;s &#8212; it&#8217;s really the only top level that has serious traction to it.  I&#8217;m willing to speculate a bit on .us and .info domains, but a lot needs to happen before those (or any other non-.com&#8217;s) takeoff to an appreciable degree.</p>
<p>Sometimes I wonder whether - in the long term - some of the country code top levels will only hold value for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Country_code_top-level_domain" rel="nofollow">unconventional uses</a>, like <a href="http://del.icio.us" rel="nofollow">del.icio.us</a>.</p>
<p>Time will tell.  Thanks again for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie</title>
		<link>http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/bingereviews-my-binge-on-political-domain-names-before-the-2008-election/#comment-41</link>
		<author>charlie</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/bingereviews-my-binge-on-political-domain-names-before-the-2008-election/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Matt,

I'm prejudice. :)  I only like the .com's because I feel that they're more natural.  The .us ones are good, but I just can't imagine them getting much traffic, but you will know better than me.  

Also, I visited all of the .com's and I was delited to see that both sides of the isle are investing in adwords.

Great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m prejudice. <img src='http://domainbinge.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I only like the .com&#8217;s because I feel that they&#8217;re more natural.  The .us ones are good, but I just can&#8217;t imagine them getting much traffic, but you will know better than me.  </p>
<p>Also, I visited all of the .com&#8217;s and I was delited to see that both sides of the isle are investing in adwords.</p>
<p>Great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/bingereviews-my-binge-on-political-domain-names-before-the-2008-election/#comment-40</link>
		<author>Matt</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/bingereviews-my-binge-on-political-domain-names-before-the-2008-election/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>I agree on .us domains.  That's the big speculative play with these domains.  I think the political angle gives the extension some added value here (hillarys.us is better than a meaningless acmebusiness.us, IMHO), but it's still not a .com.

These are going to be fun to watch, I think.

I actually disagree re .info.  I tend to think that .info domains have tremendous value for generic names that relate to &lt;i&gt;newer&lt;/i&gt; subjects that people are looking for information on.  If it becomes widely known that .info = information, I think .info could come into it's own.  

But, that's coming from a guy that owns genericbiologicals.info.  ;-)

Thanks for the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree on .us domains.  That&#8217;s the big speculative play with these domains.  I think the political angle gives the extension some added value here (hillarys.us is better than a meaningless acmebusiness.us, IMHO), but it&#8217;s still not a .com.</p>
<p>These are going to be fun to watch, I think.</p>
<p>I actually disagree re .info.  I tend to think that .info domains have tremendous value for generic names that relate to <i>newer</i> subjects that people are looking for information on.  If it becomes widely known that .info = information, I think .info could come into it&#8217;s own.  </p>
<p>But, that&#8217;s coming from a guy that owns genericbiologicals.info.  <img src='http://domainbinge.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domains for Sale</title>
		<link>http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/bingereviews-my-binge-on-political-domain-names-before-the-2008-election/#comment-39</link>
		<author>Domains for Sale</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/bingereviews-my-binge-on-political-domain-names-before-the-2008-election/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>I think you got some good domain names.  However, I'm not yet sold on .us.  I think it has the most potential out of the gtdls but am not sure it is going to catch on.  However, I think it's worth a lot more than a .info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you got some good domain names.  However, I&#8217;m not yet sold on .us.  I think it has the most potential out of the gtdls but am not sure it is going to catch on.  However, I think it&#8217;s worth a lot more than a .info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
