<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DomainBinge &#187; speculation</title>
	<link>http://domainbinge.com</link>
	<description>A beginner's guide to the domain industry</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>BingeReviews - My binge on political domain names before the 2008 election</title>
		<link>http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/bingereviews-my-binge-on-political-domain-names-before-the-2008-election/</link>
		<comments>http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/bingereviews-my-binge-on-political-domain-names-before-the-2008-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[speculation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[BingeReviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/bingereviews-my-binge-on-political-domain-names-before-the-2008-election/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been in a bit of a political mood lately, so I decided to use the first official BingeReview post to get comments on a recent binge I made on political domain names.
There&#8217;s a bit of a background to this binge&#8230;.My primary domain investing strategy is to speculate on domains that I believe will become [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://domainbinge.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/awic-1.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://domainbinge.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/awic-1.jpg','popup','width=240,height=240,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://domainbinge.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/awic-1-tm.jpg" height="100" width="100" border="0" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="awic" title="awic" /></a>I&#8217;ve been in a bit of a political mood lately, so I decided to use the first official <a href="http://domainbinge.com/archives/bingereviews/new-feature-bingereviews/" title="Introducing BingeReviews on DomainBinge">BingeReview</a> post to get comments on a recent binge I made on political domain names.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a bit of a background to this binge&#8230;.My primary domain investing strategy is to speculate on domains that I believe will become generic at some point in the future.  This strategy offers the advantage of being relatively cheap - most of the domains I identify are still available for registration.  But, the risk is significant - there is no guarantee that the names will actually become generic (or even well-known).</p>
<p>A few weeks back, I decided I wanted a few political domains before the 2008 US presidential election.  I figured that &#8220;all the good names were taken&#8221; and made a decision to throw my speculative strategy out the window.  I started searching the aftermarket to see if any good names were available.</p>
<p>I found very few that interested me, and got a bit frustrated.  Then, on a whim, really, I decided to do a bit of brainstorming and see if I could find some good names there will still available for registration.</p>
<p>To my surprise, I found - and grabbed - some decent names.  I didn&#8217;t realize it until after I binged, but my speculative strategy actually played two roles here:</p>
<p>1.  The value of these domains, clearly, depends on the outcome of the 2008 Presidential election;<br />
2.  Some of the best domains from this binge (in my eyes) are .us domains&#8230;the value of which is still largely unproven</p>
<p>With that as background, here&#8217;s my binge on political domain names. In each group, I&#8217;ve put the domain(s) at the top that I think has the most potential.</p>
<p><!-- technorati tags start -->
<p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/2008 election" rel="tag">2008 election</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/domain names" rel="tag">domain names</a></p>
<p><!-- technorati tags end --><br />
 <a href="http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/bingereviews-my-binge-on-political-domain-names-before-the-2008-election/#more-34" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/bingereviews-my-binge-on-political-domain-names-before-the-2008-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assigning value to a speculative domain</title>
		<link>http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/assigning-value-to-a-speculative-domain/</link>
		<comments>http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/assigning-value-to-a-speculative-domain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 21:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[speculation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/assigning-value-to-a-speculative-domain/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Assigning a value to a domain is tricky, even more so for speculative domains.  I recently formulated a series of questions to help myself decide whether to accept or reject an offer for a speculative domain of mine.  The questions didn't assign a value to the domain, but they did help me realize that the offer was too low.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not long ago, I wrote about the <a href="http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/assigning-value-to-a-speculative-domain/">principles I&#8217;m using to guide my early domaining efforts</a>.  In that post, I noted that my investment strategy is more like that of Warren Buffett than of a day-trader:  <em>buy and hold for the long term</em>.</p>
<p>Yesterday, though, that strategy was tested.  I received an offer to buy a speculative domain that I&#8217;ve been holding for less than a year.  The initial offer would have given me nearly a 100X profit (and would have paid the renewal fees on my portfolio for <em>a long time</em>).</p>
<p>I have to admit, it was a tough decision despite my commitment to the buy and hold strategy.  I&#8217;ve set up my domaining business as a pure sideline - I pay for all of it with &#8216;extra&#8217; money and don&#8217;t need it to generate any cash.  But the temptation to realize a 100X profit was incredibly strong.  Only a crazy person would walk away from that, right?</p>
<p>Wrong.  I ultimately decided that only a crazy person would flip <em>this domain at this time</em>.</p>
<p>How did I make the decision?  This was the hard part - I hadn&#8217;t received an offer like this before, so I had no frame of reference or rules to go by.  I had no idea how to assign a value to the domain and, therefore, had no meaningful way to analyze the offer (other than &#8220;hey, that looks like a bunch of money&#8221;).</p>
<p>I thought about it for a bit, and ultimately scratched the following questions on a notepad:</p>
<p> <a href="http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/assigning-value-to-a-speculative-domain/#more-31" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://domainbinge.com/archives/speculation/assigning-value-to-a-speculative-domain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
