<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DomainBinge &#187; deals</title>
	<link>http://domainbinge.com</link>
	<description>A beginner's guide to the domain industry</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>.info domain sells on SEDO for $2k&#8230;.is Google lurking?</title>
		<link>http://domainbinge.com/archives/info/info-domain-sells-on-sedo-for-2kis-google-lurking/</link>
		<comments>http://domainbinge.com/archives/info/info-domain-sells-on-sedo-for-2kis-google-lurking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[.info]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainbinge.com/archives/featured/info-domain-sells-on-sedo-for-2kis-google-lurking/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Panoramio agreed to be acquired by Google on May 31, 2007.  panoramio.info recently sold on SEDO for $2k, and the whois record was updated on July 17, 2007 to reflect an acquisition company as the registrant.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sedo.com">SEDO</a> is currently listing <a href="http://panoramio.info">panoramio.info</a> in its Recent Sales panel.  The domain name apparently sold for $2k.<br />
But to whom?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s some interesting facts:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.panoramio.com/">Panoramio</a> is a web-based, geo-tagged-image storage company that <a href="http://www.panoramio.com/blog/google-agrees-to-acquire-panoramio/">agreed to be acquired by Google</a> on May 31st of this year.</li>
<li>The <a href="http://whois.domaintools.com/panoramio.info">whois record</a> for the domain was updated yesterday and now reflects <a href="http://www.marksmen.com/">an acquisition company</a> as the registrant.</li>
<li>Where I sit in the world, the domain redirects to <a href="http://www.iberoamerica.es/panoramio/">this site</a>.  That might change as a DNS change propagates, but we&#8217;ll see&#8230;.</li>
</ul>
<p>Anyone want to give odds on whether Google bought the domain?</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://domainbinge.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/logo-panoramio-google.gif" onclick="window.open('http://domainbinge.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/logo-panoramio-google.gif','popup','width=307,height=72,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://domainbinge.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/logo-panoramio-google-tm.jpg" alt="Logo-Panoramio-Google" border="1" height="100" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="426" /></a></p>
<p><!-- technorati tags start --></p>
<p style="text-align: right; font-size: 10px">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/.info" rel="tag">.info</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/domain%20investing" rel="tag">domain investing</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/panoramio" rel="tag">panoramio</a></p>
<p><!-- technorati tags end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://domainbinge.com/archives/info/info-domain-sells-on-sedo-for-2kis-google-lurking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iphone.com sale price unclear - reports put it north of $1M</title>
		<link>http://domainbinge.com/archives/deals/iphonecom-sale-price-unclear-reports-put-it-north-of-1m/</link>
		<comments>http://domainbinge.com/archives/deals/iphonecom-sale-price-unclear-reports-put-it-north-of-1m/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainbinge.com/archives/deals/iphonecom-sale-price-unclear-reports-put-it-north-of-1m/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple bought the iphone.com domain in the waning days leading up to its launch of the iPhone.  While the actual sale price remains unclear, several reports put it...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://domainbinge.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/iphone.png" onclick="window.open('http://domainbinge.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/iphone.png','popup','width=666,height=526,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://domainbinge.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/iphone-tm.jpg" alt="Iphone" align="right" border="0" height="100" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="126" /></a>Apple waited until the last minute to acquire the iphone.com domain.  While the actual price paid to Michael Kovatch, who secured the domain in 1995, has not been made public, <a href="http://www.domainnews.com/aftermarket/0320070704/apple-acquires-iphonecom-domain-for-us1m/">several</a> <a href="http://www.maccast.com/2007/07/12/maccast-20070712/">reports</a> have put the figure north of $1M USD (note:  all reports seem to flow back to this <a href="http://blog.domaintools.com/2007/07/iphone-now-owned-by-apple/">excellent post about the domain sale</a> on <a href="http://blog.domaintools.com/">DomainTools Blog</a>).</p>
<p>Seems cheap to me, considering the company just launched a revolution on the shoulders of the iPhone brand.</p>
<p><!-- technorati tags start --></p>
<p style="text-align: right; font-size: 10px">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Apple" rel="tag">Apple</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/iPhone" rel="tag">iPhone</a></p>
<p><!-- technorati tags end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://domainbinge.com/archives/deals/iphonecom-sale-price-unclear-reports-put-it-north-of-1m/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TRAFFIC live auction results are in - domain auction exceeds 10MM</title>
		<link>http://domainbinge.com/archives/auctions/traffic-live-auction-results-are-in-domain-auction-exceeds-10mm/</link>
		<comments>http://domainbinge.com/archives/auctions/traffic-live-auction-results-are-in-domain-auction-exceeds-10mm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[auctions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainbinge.com/archives/auctions/traffic-live-auction-results-are-in-domain-auction-exceeds-10mm/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take a gander at the sorted final results of Moniker&#8217;s live domain auction from this week&#8217;s NYC TRAFFIC conference.  Do you need any more evidence of the investment potential for great domain names?  I didn&#8217;t think so.
As an aside, DomainNameWire live blogged the auction from the conference.  Need any more evidence of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a gander at the <a href="http://marketplacepro.moniker.com/auction/live_auction_ticker.html">sorted final results of Moniker&#8217;s live domain auction</a> from this week&#8217;s NYC TRAFFIC conference.  Do you need any more evidence of the investment potential for great domain names?  I didn&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>As an aside, <a href="http://domainnamewire.com/">DomainNameWire</a> <a href="http://domainnamewire.com/2007/06/21/live-domain-name-auction-results-seniorscom-18m/">live blogged the auction from the conference</a>.  Need any more evidence of the power of blogging?  I didn&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://domainbinge.com/archives/auctions/traffic-live-auction-results-are-in-domain-auction-exceeds-10mm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sale of Iran.com highlights value of &#8220;hot topic&#8221; domains with uncertain sustainability</title>
		<link>http://domainbinge.com/archives/strategies/sale-of-irancom-highlights-value-of-hot-topic-domains-with-uncertain-sustainability/</link>
		<comments>http://domainbinge.com/archives/strategies/sale-of-irancom-highlights-value-of-hot-topic-domains-with-uncertain-sustainability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[strategies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainbinge.com/archives/uncategorized/sale-of-irancom-highlights-value-of-hot-topic-domains-with-uncertain-sustainability/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some domains will always have intrinsic value.  Think news.com, suppplies.com, and trucks.com.  These are the ultra-generics - subjects that are not overly sensitive to the constantly shifting focus of our collective mind.  People are always looking for news.  Purchasing managers are always thinking about supplies.  And construction workers are always [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some domains will always have intrinsic value.  Think <a href="http://news.com">news.com</a>, <a href="http://supplies.com">suppplies.com</a>, and <a href="http://trucks.com">trucks.com</a>.  These are the ultra-generics - subjects that are not overly sensitive to the constantly shifting focus of our collective mind.  People are always looking for news.  Purchasing managers are always thinking about supplies.  And construction workers are always thinking about trucks (well, maybe not always).</p>
<p>The value of &#8220;hot topic&#8221; domains, in contrast, shifts as the focus of the collective mind shifts.  Think <a href="http://worldseries.com">WorldSeries.com</a>, <a href="http://2008election.com">2008election.com</a>, and even <a href="http://parishiltonjailpics.com">parishiltonjailpics.com</a>.  Determining the value of these domains is a bit trickier than others because it requires a timing component and an assessment of the <em>sustainability</em> of the underlying topic.</p>
<p>The sustainability calculation is relatively straight-forward for some topics.  Think about the 2008 election.  People are already interested in the topic, and we know (approximately) when that interest will begin to fade.  The value window is quite well-defined, and the value of domains tightly related to that topic will likely remain high in the window, and drop once the window closes.</p>
<p>Sustainability for other topics, though, is quite difficult.  Think about poor Paris Hilton.  Surely people are thinking about photos of her in jail today&#8230;but how long will that remain the case?  What if she gets thrown in the slammer again&#8230;and again?  What if she truly did find religion?</p>
<p><a href="http://dnjournal.com">DNJournal</a> reports that, this week, <a href="http://www.dnjournal.com/ytd-sales-charts.htm">Iran.com sold for $400,000</a>.  From a US point-of-view, it seems to be a &#8220;hot topic&#8221; domain with uncertain sustainability.  How long will Iran be on the collective mind?  It&#8217;s probably a safe bet that we&#8217;ll be thinking about it for awhile, but that focus could also disappear overnight (perhaps some Tuesday night in November of next year).</p>
<p>The key for domainers, though, is that it shows that &#8220;hot topic&#8221; domains with questionable sustainability can still hold significant value.  The interest in domain investments is reaching new highs, and it&#8217;s good to see the value of these speculative plays increase as well.</p>
<p><!-- technorati tags start --></p>
<p style="text-align: right; font-size: 10px">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/domain%20names" rel="tag">domain names</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/iran.com" rel="tag">iran.com</a></p>
<p><!-- technorati tags end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://domainbinge.com/archives/strategies/sale-of-irancom-highlights-value-of-hot-topic-domains-with-uncertain-sustainability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surface.tv domain sells for $27k</title>
		<link>http://domainbinge.com/archives/deals/surfacetv-domain-sells-for-27k/</link>
		<comments>http://domainbinge.com/archives/deals/surfacetv-domain-sells-for-27k/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainbinge.com/archives/deals/surfacetv-domain-sells-for-27k/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surface computing has been a hot topic since Jeff Han delivered his presentation on multi-touch interfaces at the TED conference last year.
The surface computing concept - using the surface of a computer monitor as the primary user interface - received a significant boost a few weeks ago when Microsoft announced its plans to develop a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surface computing has been a hot topic since <a href="http://cs.nyu.edu/~jhan/ftirtouch/">Jeff Han</a> delivered <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=UcKqyn-gUbY">his presentation on multi-touch interfaces</a> at the <a href="http://www.ted.com/">TED conference</a> last year.</p>
<p>The surface computing concept - using the surface of a computer monitor as the primary user interface - received a significant boost a few weeks ago when <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2007/may07/05-29Surface.mspx">Microsoft announced</a> its plans to develop a product line based on the technology.  (the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/surface/">Microsoft demo videos</a> are amazing).</p>
<p>The race for generic surface computing domains started just before the Microsoft announcement and peaked on the day of.  And deals are already being made.  <a href="http://surface.tv">Surface.tv</a> recently <a href="http://www.king.net/content/view/28985/">sold for $27k</a>, which is apparently the highest price ever paid for a .tv domain.</p>
<p>Hmmmm&#8230;I wonder if there&#8217;s an interest in <a href="http://usesurface.com">usesurface.com</a>, <a href="http://usingsurface.com">usingsurface.com</a>, <a href="http://surfacedemo.com">surfacedemo.com</a>, <a href="http://cometosurface.com">cometosurface.com</a>, <a href="http://moresurfacearea.com">moresurfacearea.com</a>, <a href="http://playonsurface.com">playonsurface.com</a>, <a href="http://surfacefuture.com">surfacefuture.com</a>, <a href="http://theworksurface.com">theworksurface.com</a>, <a href="http://workingsurface.com">workingsurface.com</a>, <a href="http://workonsurface.com">workonsurface.com</a> or <a href="http://usethesurface.com">usethesurface.com</a>?</p>
<p> <img src='http://domainbinge.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://domainbinge.com/archives/deals/surfacetv-domain-sells-for-27k/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WSJ buries the lead, misses domain side of story</title>
		<link>http://domainbinge.com/archives/press/wsj-buries-the-lead-misses-domain-side-of-story/</link>
		<comments>http://domainbinge.com/archives/press/wsj-buries-the-lead-misses-domain-side-of-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 02:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainbinge.com/archives/deals/wsj-buries-the-lead-misses-domain-side-of-story/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How Najafi Cos. Hit The Buyout Jackpot - WSJ.com
Did you hear?  Najafi Cos. sold Network Solutions for a cool $800M (and a 3500% profit).  Nice&#8230;and encouraging for the domaining set.
Interestingly, the Wall Street Journal article on the deal focuses on the private equity aspect of the story&#8230;and all but misses the underlying domain [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB118048898651218036-lMyQjAxMDE3ODMwMDQzODA4Wj.html">How Najafi Cos. Hit The Buyout Jackpot - WSJ.com</a></p>
<p>Did you hear?  Najafi Cos. sold Network Solutions for a cool $800M (and a 3500% profit).  Nice&#8230;and encouraging for the domaining set.</p>
<p>Interestingly, the Wall Street Journal article on the deal focuses on the private equity aspect of the story&#8230;and all but misses the underlying domain aspect of the story.  I know private equity LBO&#8217;s are shaping up to be the financial story of 2007, but it&#8217;s too bad they missed the &#8220;there&#8217;s gold in them thar hills&#8221; angle.</p>
<p>Schilling has <a href="http://frankschilling.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/05/how_to_make_350.html">more</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB118048898651218036-lMyQjAxMDE3ODMwMDQzODA4Wj.html"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://domainbinge.com/archives/press/wsj-buries-the-lead-misses-domain-side-of-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
